ISSN: 0000-0000 ISSN: 0000-0000

PUBLICATION POLICY

Nature Ayurved is a peer-reviewed international journal committed to the timely dissemination of high-quality scholarly work in Ayurveda, integrative medicine, allied health sciences, and related interdisciplinary fields. The journal follows a bi-monthly publication schedule, releasing six issues annually. Issues are ordinarily published in the months of: January, March, May, July, September, November.

Manuscripts accepted for publication after successful peer review, editorial evaluation, and completion of all publication formalities will be scheduled for the next available issue based on editorial priority, thematic relevance, and date of final acceptance. The journal reserves the right to publish special issues, supplementary issues, conference proceedings, or thematic editions whenever required. All accepted articles may be made available online as “Articles in Press” or “Ahead of Print” prior to their inclusion in a scheduled issue, subject to editorial discretion. While every effort is made to adhere to the declared publication timeline, the journal reserves the right to modify release dates, combine issues, or delay publication due to unforeseen editorial, technical, or administrative circumstances. The editorial board maintains full authority over issue planning, article sequencing, pagination, and final publication decisions to ensure academic quality and publication integrity.

Plagiarism Policy

Nature Ayurved: International Journal of Ayurved Science & Research

At Nature Ayurved: International Journal of Ayurved Science & Research, we are committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity, originality, and ethical publishing practices. Plagiarism in any form is considered a serious violation of scholarly ethics and is strictly prohibited. Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to:

• Copying text, ideas, data, images, or results from another source without proper acknowledgment.

• Presenting another person’s work as one’s own.

• Using published or unpublished material without citation.

• Paraphrasing another author’s work without appropriate reference.

• Self-plagiarism, including reuse of one’s own previously published content without proper citation or permission.

• Submitting duplicate or substantially similar manuscripts to multiple journals.

Author Responsibilities

Authors are solely responsible for ensuring that their submitted manuscripts are original and free from plagiarism. All sources, references, and previously published materials used in the manuscript must be properly cited according to the journal guidelines. Authors should always present concepts, interpretations, and findings in their own words.

Plagiarism Screening

All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subject to plagiarism detection screening using standard plagiarism checking tools before and during the peer-review process. The editorial board reserves the right to recheck manuscripts at any stage of review or publication.

Actions in Case of Plagiarism

If plagiarism is identified at any stage, the journal may take the following actions depending on the severity of the misconduct:

Before Publication

• Immediate rejection of the manuscript. • Notification to the corresponding author with explanation. • Temporary or permanent restriction on future submissions.

After Publication

• Retraction of the published article. • Publication of an official retraction notice. • Notification to the author’s affiliated institution, funding agency, or regulatory authority. • Informing the original copyright holder or affected author(s).

Acceptable Similarity Limit

Authors are advised to maintain overall similarity below acceptable academic standards and ensure that no copied content is included without citation. High similarity due to references, common terminology, or methodology sections may be assessed separately by editors.

Editorial Rights

The final decision regarding plagiarism, originality, and ethical suitability of a manuscript rests solely with the Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board of the journal.

Commitment to Ethical Publishing

The journal encourages all authors, reviewers, and editors to uphold transparency, honesty, and responsible research publication practices in order to promote the growth of authentic Ayurvedic scientific literature.

Review Policy

Nature Ayurved: International Journal of Ayurved Science & Research

At Nature Ayurved: International Journal of Ayurved Science & Research, we are committed to ensuring a fair, transparent, timely, and high-quality peer review process. Every manuscript submitted to the journal undergoes a structured editorial and peer-review procedure to maintain academic excellence and scientific integrity.

Manuscript Review Process
Step 1: Submission by Author

Authors may submit their original research articles, review papers, case studies, short communications, and other scholarly manuscripts through the journal’s official submission system or via the official editorial email as prescribed by the journal. All submissions must comply with the journal’s author guidelines, formatting standards, and ethical policies.

Step 2: Initial Editorial Screening

Upon receipt, each manuscript is screened by the Editorial Office for: • Scope and relevance to Ayurveda and allied sciences • Basic formatting compliance • Grammar and language quality • Completeness of manuscript files • Ethical declarations and authorship details • Plagiarism screening Manuscripts with excessive grammatical errors, poor formatting, or non-compliance with journal guidelines may be returned to the authors for correction before peer review.

Step 3: Double-Blind Peer Review

All eligible manuscripts are subjected to a double-blind peer review process, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent subject experts, and where necessary, three or more reviewers may be invited for specialized evaluation. Reviewers assess manuscripts on the basis of: • Originality and novelty • Scientific quality and methodology • Relevance to journal scope • Clinical/research significance • Literature review and references • Ethical compliance • Clarity of presentation • Overall contribution to Ayurvedic science

Step 4: Reviewer Recommendations

Based on reviewer comments, the editorial decision may be one of the following: 1. Accepted 2. Rejected 3. Accepted with Minor Revisions 4. Accepted with Major Revisions Authors receiving revision requests must submit the revised manuscript within the specified timeline along with point-by-point responses to reviewer comments.

Step 5: Final Editorial Decision

After satisfactory revision (if applicable), the Editor-in-Chief or Editorial Board makes the final decision regarding acceptance and forwards the manuscript for production.

Step 6: Production and Publication

Accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting, layout formatting, proof preparation, and issue scheduling before publication in the current or upcoming issue of the journal.

Step 7: Author Notification

Authors are informed of all major decisions, including acceptance, revision requests, rejection, and publication status through official email communication.

Confidentiality and Ethics

All submitted manuscripts are treated as confidential documents. Reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality, avoid conflicts of interest, and provide objective, constructive, and timely reviews.

Editorial Rights

The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to accept, reject, or request modifications to any manuscript based on reviewer recommendations, journal policy, and academic standards.

Commitment to Quality

Nature Ayurved Journal is dedicated to promoting authentic, evidence-based, and high-quality research in Ayurveda through a rigorous and unbiased peer review system.

Conflict of Interest Policy

A conflict of interest exists when any financial, professional, personal, or academic relationship could influence, or appear to influence, the objectivity, integrity, or interpretation of the work submitted for publication. This may include direct or indirect financial support, commercial affiliations, institutional interests, personal relationships, or academic competition. The corresponding author is responsible for obtaining relevant conflict of interest disclosures from all co-authors and ensuring that the copyright/authorship declaration form, duly signed by all authors, is submitted along with the manuscript. It is the duty of the corresponding author to confirm with all co-authors whether any competing interests exist. Any such disclosures must be clearly stated in the title page or cover letter at the time of submission. As part of our ethical publishing standards, all reviewers are required to decline review assignments where a potential conflict of interest exists or to declare any such conflict before accepting the manuscript for review. Similarly, all editors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest in accordance with editorial ethics policies. Editors with a conflict related to a submitted manuscript will not participate in its review or decision-making process, and the manuscript will be reassigned to another qualified editor. If any conflict of interest is identified after publication, authors, readers, or concerned parties are requested to notify the editorial office promptly. All reported concerns will be investigated thoroughly, normally within seven (07) working days. If the claim is found to be valid, the journal reserves the right to take appropriate corrective action, including publication of corrections, expressions of concern, retraction of the article, and removal from journal platforms or indexing databases where applicable.